Most parents find it way too awkward to debate relationships between genders with their children, provide no protection and guidance, don’t explain the way to make correct decisions but still hope that children will behave soberly and avoid problems purely intuitively.
Since all people need comprehensive knowledge on sexual activity and not always have good information sources, it’s reasonable to form sex education an obligatory discipline at college. Consistent with the WHO, it should be taught to students aged 12 and above because 34% of HIV infected persons are between 12-19 years old.
Recommendations received on such lessons are far more important than literary theory or math theorems because they ought to help children to preserve strong health, avoid diseases, unsuccessful experiments, arm them with concentration tools which can be used if indulging a sexual act.
Advocates and opponents argue whether it’s the school’s responsibility to trace not only academic achievements but also the physical and emotional well-being of scholars. Experts from Pro-Papers have analyzed the key advantages and drawbacks of sex education.
Reading, woman, girl
Joseph Redfield (CC0), Pickaway
Pros of sex education
Society can get the subsequent benefits if instructing learners on correct sexual behavior:
There are many myths about sex that ought to be dispelled and replaced with useful knowledge about safe, healthy intimate contacts.
Teenagers mature and undergo hormonal changes. This process could also be rather mysterious for them, so explanations from parents or teachers are necessary. It’s important for children to understand that it’s alright and their organisms grow during a normal way.
An opposite gender usually causes children’s curiosity. Sex education can provide insight into differences, show why girls and boys not always behave within the same way and have unequal needs. With theoretical knowledge, teenagers will have fewer reasons to explore male and feminine sexual peculiarities by conducting dangerous experiments.
Some kids even don’t know that oldsters abuse them sexually. Once taught to perceive rude attitude as a norm, they are doing not protect personal rights, have nobody to invite help, aren’t sure whether or not they have the proper to try to it. This problem affects thousands of youngsters worldwide in both progressive and Third World countries. At sex education lessons, an educator should explain how normal parents treat their children, what actions are inadmissible and will be reported to organizations controlling parental behavior.
It is far better if a toddler communicates with an educator about sex than visits pornographic websites and other resources with misleading information. The web is an uncontrolled space filled with rubbish. If kids drown in it, they’ll form a perverted idea of an intimate contact contradicting a family-centered ideology during which sex may be a love manifestation between spouses.
Many children make only one wrong step and convey a tough burden into a cheerful teenage life. Inexperienced adolescents don’t understand that price for curiosity and short moments of delight could also be way too high. Teachers should provide information on the results of irresponsible attitude towards sex.
Students learn to think critically, weigh all benefits and threats before taking some actions. Sex education classes show the importance of prudence, abstinence, or a minimum of using proven protection methods.
Book, open, book pages
Cons of sex education
Like any ideology, this discipline has some downsides:
There are only a few specialists able to teach sex education at knowledgeable level. Most professors don’t have comprehensive knowledge and even make mistakes in their own intimate lives. A teacher having vague ideas a few discipline may rather bring harm than show an accurate direction. If students start applying wrong approaches, their life may become even worse than before passing a course. As kids are very impressionable and absorb information sort of a sponge, it’s going to be challenging for them to urge obviate wrong habits in adulthood. Therefore, schools should entrust teaching sex education only to experienced specialists and confirm that students interpret information received during a class correctly.
It is not customary to debate sex in polite society. As parents usually avoid this subject and set a sort of veto reception, it’s going to be rather embarrassing for teenagers to precise their thoughts and ask questions. Also, children often approach sex education with ridicule and don’t take it seriously. Therefore, serious psychological preparation should be conducted to point out learners why they have this subject.
Most schools introduce sex education into a curriculum as a non-compulsory discipline. Teachers hold several lessons, give brief explanations on STD and contraceptive methods. Kids forget lecture material once they leave a classroom. Of course, it’s impossible to market some tangible changes in society with such an approach. A faculty administration should be more serious about students’ intimate life.
Some parents claim that sex education contradicts their families’ religious ideology. Schools may refuse to introduce this discipline to a curriculum so as to avoid conflicts.
The above factors are rather fields for research, development, and perfection than disadvantages. It’s going to be concluded that sex education has countless benefits and will be taught to teenagers. Some teachers doubt whether children will perceive it adequately since many intimate topics still stay prohibited and confusing. But it’s worth forgetting about shyness when human life is at stake. If sex education turns into a customary practice, nobody are going to be surprised by it over several years.
